|
Page 1
(This is page 2)
PART VI:
APPENDICES
1.
THE TAU: COAT OF ARMS AND SIGNATURE OF SAINT FRANCIS OF ASSISI
The first biographer of St.
Francis, who was an eyewitness and a contemporary, Bro. Thomas of Celano,
wrote: He favoured the sign of the TAU over all others. With it
alone he signed letters he sent, and painted it on the walls of cells everywhere … he signed his letters with this sign whenever charity or
necessity led him to send something in writing (treatise on the miracles, N°3
and N° 159).
What is the TAU and why was it so
important for St. Francis?

The
TAU in the Bible
The letter TAU
is contained in the alphabet of both the original languages of the Bible, Hebrew
and Greek. While the TAU has maintained the same shape till today (τ –
small letter and Τ - capital letter), in Hebrew it has changed from its
old form practically identical to the Greek Tau and our “T” to its present form
(ת), though it has maintained the last place in the Hebrew alphabet.
The books
of Job and Ezechiel. The two clearest references
to the Tau in the Old Testament are in Job 31:35 and Ez 9:4. At the end of his
long speech, Job says literally: Here is my TAU, let Shaddai (the
Almighty) answer me, which is a way of saying, “Here is my signature” or
“I have now finished speaking”, let the Almighty answer me”.
In one of his
visions, the prophet Ezechiel sees God who calls a man clothed in linen, who
had writing instruments at his side and tells him, Go through the city
and sign a TAU upon the foreheads of the men who sigh and groan over all the
abominations that are committed in it”. (Ez 9:3-4) in the ensuing
destruction of the city, all those who were signed with a TAU were spared. In
ancient Hebrew culture, besides serving as a signature, as in Job’s case, the
TAU also served to identify livestock, slaves and other property. In this case,
the persons signed with the TAU belonged to the Lord, consecrated, and therefore
not to be touched. It is clearly a prophecy of Christ’s redemption on a cross.
The book of
Revelation. The word “Tau” does not appear in the book of Revelation, and
yet the visions of St. John are closely linked with this symbol. When the text
speaks of “the seal printed on the foreheads of the servants,”
it clearly alludes to Ezechiel 9:4 and the Tau printed on the foreheads of the
penitents. All scholars agree that these texts in Revelation are inspired by
Ezechiel’s vision.
The IV
Lateran Council
It was an
extraordinary homily delivered on this passage of Ezechiel that inspired St.
Francis to adopt this symbol of the cross as his signature and as coat of arms
of the Order. On 11 November 1215, one of the greatest popes of the middle
ages, Innocent III, opened the IV Lateran Council. He wanted to initiate a
badly needed reform in the Church through this Council which was the 12th
in the History of the Catholic Church, the largest up to that date, and one of
the most important. He invited, not only all the Bishops of the Church, but
also all superiors, leaders and founders of old and new congregations to
participate in the Council. St. Francis, whose Order was approved six years
previously, was also among the invited. In the second part of his memorable
opening sermon, the pope commented Ezechiel chapter 9, making his own the words
of God to the prophet: Pass through the city and mark with a TAU
the foreheads of the men who weep… and exhorted all present to be
champions of the TAU and of the cross.
How did St.
Francis react? He took the discourse of the pope as a message addressed
personally to him. The pope had said, “mercy will be granted to those who bear
the TAU, a mark of a life of penance and renewal in Christ”. From then on,
Francis wanted to sign himself with the TAU, and his brothers along with him;
the TAU will become the sign of the Order’s mission.
The TAU
coloured his entire spirituality, which from 1215 on, became even more a
spirituality of the cross and of salvation. This shines through the prayers,
which he composed, for example, his Office of the Passion.
The TAU,
St. Francis and the Lepers
The homily of
Pope Innocent III in 1215 was not the only occasion to foster the devotion St.
Francis had for the TAU. It had for him another important meaning which
preceded the IV Lateran Council: the place lepers held in his life. We know
that when he visited Rome in 1209 to obtain the approval of his first Rule from
Innocent III, St. Francis stayed in the leper hospital of St. Anthony in Rome.
This hospital was maintained by the Brothers of St. Anthony the Hermit (the
Antonines) who had the TAU for an emblem.
They used to carry in their hand a stick at the end of which was a TAU, and they
also had a large TAU sewn on their habits.
The stay of
St. Francis at the Antonine leper hospital in Rome was neither accidental nor
the only one because lepers had a special place in St. Francis’ life. After the
encountering and kissing the leper
at the beginning of his vocation, he inaugurates his service to Christ by
serving the lepers: “The Lord Himself brought me among them, and I cared for
them with all my heart” (Testament 2). He also practically imposed this
work on them as their novitiate training: “at the beginning of the Order, he
wanted the Brothers to live in the leper hospitals in order to care for
them. When postulants, nobles or wanderers, presented themselves, they were
informed that among other things, they would have to serve lepers and reside in
their hospitals” (Legend of Perugia 102). The love that Francis had for lepers
was none other than the love he had for Jesus, because for Him every leper was
Jesus.
We are
certain, therefore, that Francis was already well acquainted with this sign
before he went to the Council and must have been so pleased with the proposal
made by Pope Innocent III in the opening homily, as it already dear to him.
Spirituality of the Tau
Francis
shared the common ambition of all youths of his day: to become a Knight, and on
two occasions he attempted to gain this honour by fighting for a cause.
After a first dream in which he was shown a palace adorned with all sorts of
arms and a voice telling him that all those arms were for him and his followers,
Francis set out to fight for the Pope. However, along the way, he had another
vision, in which the Lord told him Go back to the land of your birth because
I will fulfil your dream in a spiritual way” (2 Cel 6).
This episode
was very important in Francis’ life because it shows us how his ambition for the
knighthood became an instrument in God’s hands to trigger off his conversion
process.
In 1215, the
year of the IV Lateran Council, God’s promise at Spoleto had already
materialised: his Order approved and he had thousands of friars who followed
him. When Francis listened to the homily of Pope Innocent III, he was quite
quick to adopt it as his coat of arms. In those days, every knight, noble
family, king or society had a coat of arms sculpted on buildings painted or sewn
on clothes to indicate their identity. In choosing this coat of arms
illustrates the spiritual evolution of that dream in Francis, who continued to
consider himself the herald of the great King (1 Cel 16)
Conclusion
For St.
Francis, the Tau was first of all a programme of penance,
following in the footsteps of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Secondly, it was a symbol
of a mission of renewal within oneself and the Church. Finally,
it was a sign of the glory shared with the risen Lord which gave
Francis confidence in the face of all difficulties.
2.0 THE
CRUCIFIX OF SAN DAMIANO. How to read to icon and use it for personal prayer
Introduction
When St.
Francis was on his way towards conversion, he was walking one day by the
Church of San Damiano, which was abandoned by
everyone and almost in ruins. Led by the Spirit he went in to pray and knelt
down before the crucifix. After some time the
lips of the image of Christ crucified spoke to him. “Francis”, it said, “go
rebuild my house. As you see, it is all being destroyed” (2 Cel 11). This
was the beginning of Francis’ mission which had an extraordinary impact in the
life of the Church. From that time onwards, so many people throughout the ages
have venerated the cross that spoke to St. Francis.
The Cross of
San Damiano, however, is more than a beautiful painting. It is an icon created
to reveal the essence of a profound mystery: it contains a surprising wealth of
rich teachings inspired by the Gospel according to John. For this reason, we
say “read” an icon, not look at an icon, because each particular detail of an
icon is something to understand and not merely to be looked at, as in any common
painting. The following explanation can be of help for anyone who contemplates
this cross during his prayer of meditation.
The
Frame and the Base
The border of
the icon sets the tone immediately. It is formed of a great number of shells.
Among the ancients, the seashell had become a symbol of the beauty and eternity
of heaven because of its beauty and endurance. This border of seashells shows
us that the icon is destined by its very nature to reveal heavenly mystery.
However, the border is not fully complete. It is not closed at the base,
suggesting that a space has been left free to allow for an entry. In fact,
right at the opening, we can clearly distinguish two persons – others cannot be
distinguished because this part of the icon is not in a good state of
preservation. It is not improbable that other figures have been erased by the
kisses of the faithful venerating the icon throughout the ages.
Who are the
figures at the base of the cross? One of the two clearly distinguished persons
has to be St. Peter, who is part of the base of the icon which seems to be
formed of a block of stone. It reminds us of the Rock, that is the authority of
Peter according to the words of Jesus, “You are Peter and upon this rock I will
build my Church” (Mt 16:18). Besides the traditional short beard attributed to
St. Peter, the first figure from the right is also standing beneath the cock,
reminding us of the scene of Peter’s denial after the crowing of the cock. The
other figures could include St. John the Baptist, St Paul, St. Damian and St.
Rufino (patron saint of the Cathedral of Assisi).
A glorified
Jesus as described by the Gospel according to John
The central
figure of Christ dominates the icon not only for its size, but also for the
light that His splendid white figure effuses on all the persons that surround
Him and face Him. The crown of glory that replaces the usual crown of thorns
indicates that the prayer of Jesus is now answered, “Father, glorify Your Son” (Jn
17,1). This living Christ effusing light and life to all around Him has already
won over suffering and death.
This victory
of the light (Jesus) over the darkness is symbolized by the red and black
colours. The red colour, symbolic of Love, found all about the icon, dramatizes
the victory of light and Love over darkness. The black colour is symbolic of
the tomb of death, brought about by the opposition to the light, of unbelief and
of sin. The risen Christ, standing over the empty and open tomb (black) with
His hands extended, is in the act of ascending to Heaven.
The wound in
Jesus’ right side is also one of the testimonies made by the beloved disciple
and can be found only in the fourth Gospel.
Th
The Crown of Glory
The sorrowful
mystery of Christ is neither forgotten nor hidden. The crown of thorns is
substituted by a triumphant oriental cross. Instead it discovers its meaning
and fulfilment in glory. We must remember this when we attempt to identify the
feelings of the others characters on the painting. Jesus is glorified and,
therefore, it is only proper that those around Him should also be in a state of
joy.
How this crown
is full of consolation! It gives meaning to every suffering. It reminds us
that every crown of thorns can be changed into a crown of glory.
Th
The Vestment of Jesus
It is very
important to take note of the vestment that Jesus is wearing, since by this
vestment we can know what office He is exercising in this icon. Notice that it
is not an ordinary loincloth; but it has a gold border. Such a vestment made of
linen, was used as a priestly vestment in the Old Testament and was called an
ephod. From various passages describing the ephod, we can draw up
the conclusion that there was a difference between the somewhat elaborate
ephod prescribed for the High Priest in Ex 28:6-12 and the ephod worn
by other priests and King David, which covered only the loins, leaving the knees
uncovered. In fact, in Ex 20:26 we find a liturgical prescription specifying
that the priest should not ascend the steps to the altar for fear of immodesty.
Again, King David was reproached by his spouse, Michal, for having displayed
himself as a commoner (2 Sam 6:13-20), which leads us to understand that David’s
vestment was truly short. In this passage, it is clear that King David was
exercising his priestly function.
While the cut
of the vestment worn by Jesus in this fits more the description of the ephod
worn by king David, the golden border of the vestment and the belt holding it,
also golden and part of the vestment, fits the description of the High Priest’s
ephod described in Ex 28:8.
We can
conclude that this icon presents Jesus as Messiah and High Priest of the New
Testament.
The Veil
over the Face of Jesus
If one looks
carefully at the icon, it becomes evident that both the face of Jesus and the
crown of glory are slightly veiled. Their brilliance is muted by a shadow that
extends as far as Jesus’ neck. As the glory of the Lord was formerly veiled by
a cloud (Ex 24:16), now this glory is veiled by the humanity of Jesus. The
Letter to the Hebrews calls this veil, the flesh of Jesus (Heb 10:20). At the
time of the Transfiguration, the veil was lifted in a certain manner and the
glory of Jesus was manifest.
The
Wounds
The wounds in
the hands, feet and side of Jesus have become fountains that are flowing
abundantly with the Blood of the Lamb of God. It is the blood of the New
Covenant that has won for us an eternal redemption (Heb 9:12).
Two Angels
(one on each side of the cross) gaze intently at the wounds in Jesus’ hands.
Four Angels (two under each arm) express their astonishment before the spectacle
of the blood shed by the only Son of God and with their hands seem to announce,
in front of the open tomb, the Resurrection and Ascension of Our Lord to all
those present.
The abundant
redeeming blood flows over the Angels and Saints, over Mary and the Centurion
(from the hands); over other Saints (from the feet) and over St. John (Blood
from the right side of Jesus).
Notice that
blood is coming out from Jesus’ right side in agreement with ancient tradition
(in particular taken from a Syrian Gospel of the 6th Century A.D.)
and also the position of the wound as seen in the Holy Shroud of Turin. This
flow of blood and water from the right side of Jesus reminds us of the stream
flowing from the right side of the Temple in Ezechiel (chapter 42). The water
that flows like a torrent from the Temple invigorates everything along its path
and gives the trees an extraordinary fruitfulness.
The
Characters under the arms of Jesus
There is no
problem identifying the characters placed beneath the arms of Jesus: the painter
of the icon has written their names at their feet. From left to right they are
Mary, John, Mary Magdalen, Mary the mother of James and the Centurion.
This glorious
representation of the Passion of the Son is revealed also in the persons closest
to Christ under the cross. First of all, we notice Mary and John both on the
right side of Jesus, which is, in the East, the place of honour. The psalmist
says: “At right hand stands the Queen in Gold of Ofir” (Psalm 45:10). They are
closely united according to the Gospel of John (John alone, in Jn 19:26 mentions
the presence of the Mother of Jesus under the cross). Mary is indicating the
beloved disciple with her right hand, reminding us of the precise moment in
which Jesus, with the blood falling over John, exclaims from the cross: “Woman,
behold Your son”. Despite the fact that Mary and Mary of Magdala have their
left hand raised to their cheek as a sign of grief, none of the persons near
them manifest an expression of deep suffering. Much more vivid is their
profound and believing adhesion to Christ, victorious Redeemer and Saviour.
Under the left arm of Jesus stand Mary of Magdala and Mary, wife of Clopas who
were present at the foot of the cross (Jn 19:25) and were also first witnesses
of the resurrection in the Gospel of Luke (Lk 24:10). On the right side of the
two women stands the Centurion that, looking at Jesus with his right hand raised
towards Him says: “Truly this was the Son of God!” (Mt 27:54; Mk 15:39; Lk
23:47). Above the shoulders of the Centurion there is the head of a minute
person whose identity is not certain. Most probably, he represents the son of
the Centurion, whom Jesus heated, but it could also be the author of the icon or
a representative of the crowd.
At the foot of
Mary we can see the soldier, whose name, according to tradition, was Longinus.
He holds in his hands the long lance with which he pierced Jesus’ side. The
corresponding soldier at the foot of the Centurion is the one who carried the
sponge soaked with vinegar. According to tradition, his name was Stepaton.
Both of these two figures have their heads turned towards the crucifix.
The
Inscription
Above the head
of Christ we see this inscription: IHS NAZARE REX IVDEORV which stands for:
Iesus (the first three letters of the name “Jesus” in Greek: IHS)
Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum – Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews. This name is
found only in the Gospel of John – the other three Gospels omit the word
“Nazarene” which affirms the profound humility Jesus assumed before being
glorified. In Jn 1:48-49 Nathanael, after affirming that nothing good can come
from Nazareth, confesses that Jesus of Nazareth is the Son of God, the King of
Israel and the Messiah.
Jesus in
the Medallion
The small
dynamic figure of Jesus in the medallion above the inscription represents the
Ascension with the trophy of the Cross in His left hand and His right hand
extended towards the right hand of the Father above the medallion. The cross is
now golden; it has become His royal sceptre and His garments of gold speak of
His victory and royalty.
It is
important to note that, according to the Gospel of John, Jesus ascended to His
Father after His death and his glorious bodily entrance into heaven happen the
same day of the resurrection. As He told Mary, “do not hold me for I have not
yet ascended to the Father” (Jn 20:17). This medallion of the Crucifix of San
Damiano clearly wants to illustrate this “glorious” Passion according to the
Gospel of John.
From high, the
right hand of the Father welcomes the Son surrounded by Angels (and Saints?).
Why does the right hand of the Father have only two fingers open? Some scholars
have advanced the hypothesis that this represents the Holy Spirit, Who is called
digitus Dei – finger
of God (see Lk 11:12; Mt 12:28). Over His shoulders, Jesus has a red stole – a
symbol of the His dominion, kingship and new priesthood instituted by His blood
and exercised in Love (red).
The Cock
Near the left
leg of Jesus, the artist has painted a cock, which is directly above the head of
St. Peter at the base of the Crucifix to remind us of the denial of Peter at the
crowing of the cock. The cock is included in some ancient paintings and also in
crucifixes found at Lucca, in central Italy. It must be noted that John was the
only direct witness of Peter’s denial during the night of the Passion. John
himself had gained entrance for Peter inside Caifa’s courtyard (See Jn 13:38;
18:15-27). After the resurrection, Peter and John are together again.
Th
The Cross of San Damiano as lived by St. Francis
When Francis
entered the Church of San Damiano, little did he know what mission was awaiting
him when seeking conversion, he prayed:
Most High,
glorious God,
enlighten the darkness of my heart
and give me
true faith,
certain hope, and perfect Charity,
sense and knowledge,
Lord,
that I may carry out
Your holy and true command.
Francis only
asked for interior enlightenment, but ended the prayer with a full disposition
to do God’s will. He had no plans except a programme of conversion that,
without his knowing, had already gone far in the eyes of God. And so, God does
not give him any instruction on how to improve himself, but:
Go and
rebuild my house. As you see, it is all being destroyed.
Francis’ first
reaction was to start rebuilding San Damiano and then other two churches. But
he soon realised that God is more interested in souls than in stones. His
“rebuilding project” did not last long, however, because God sent him many
Brothers.
When the
Crucifix spoke to St. Francis in San Damiano, it was not the first time he had
prayed in front of it because the Church was along the way he had to walk to
reach one of his father’s lands, where he used to go to pray for long periods
after his recovery from the imprisonment at Perugia.
Dear reader,
you too can try to imitate St. Francis in praying and meditating in front of
this Crucifix, praying his conversion prayer with the same spirit of humility
and disposition for interior enlightenment. If you do this long enough and
seriously enough, be prepared for some surprises!
____________________________________________
3.
FRANCISCAN CALENDAR
* When no
rank is given, it is an optional memorial.
(SFO Saints
and Blessed are underlined)
JANUARY
3. Holy
Name of Jesus Mem
7. Bl. Angela of Foligno, religious, III Order
(For the III Order)*
12. St. Bernard of Corleone, religious, I Order
14. Bl. Odoric of Pordenone, priest, I Order
16. Berard, priest, and companions, protomartyrs, (I Order) Mem
30. Hyacinth of Mariscotti, virgin, III Order (For
the III Order)
FEBRUARY
4. Joseph
of Leonissa, priest, I Order
6. Peter Baptist, Paul Miki and companions, martyrs, I and III Orders Mem
7. Colette, virgin, II Order (For II and II Order nuns: Memorial)
10. Conrad of Piacenza, hermit, III Order (For the
III Order)
MARCH
2. Bl.
Agnes of Prague, virgin, II Order (For and III Order nuns)
4. Bl. Didacus Joseph of Gadiz. priest. I Order
APRIL
3. Benedict
the Black, religious, I Order Mem
21. Conrad of Parzham, religious, I Order
23. Bl. Giles of Assisi, religious, I Order
24. FIDELIS OF SIGMARINGEN. CAPUCHIN PRIEST AND MARTYR, I Order Feast
28. Bl. Luchesius. III Order (For the III
Order)
MAY
9.
Catherine of Bologna. virgin. II Order (For II and III Order nuns: Memorial)
11. Ignatius of Laconi. Capuchin religious. I Order
16. Margaret of Cortona, III Order Memorial
17. Paschal Baylon, religious, I Order Memorial
18. FELIX OF CANTALICE. CAPUCHIN RELIGIOUS. I Order Feast
20. BERNARDINE OF SIENA. PRIEST. I Order Feast
24. DEDICATION OF THE BASILICA OF ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI Feast
28. Mary Ann of Jesus of Paredes. virgin. III Order
30. BI. Baptista Varano, virgin, II Order (For II
and III Order nuns)
JUNE
12. BI.
Jolenta. religious, II Order (For II and III Order nuns)
13. ANTHONY OF PADUA. PRIEST AND DOCTOR, I Order Feast
30. Bl. Raymond Lull, martyr, III Order (For the
III Order)
JULY
8. Bls.
Gregory Grassi, bishop and companions martyrs, I and III Order
9. Nicholas Pick, priest, and companions, martyrs,
I Order Memorial
10. Veronica Giuliani, virgin, II Order Memorial (For II and III Order nuns:
Feast)
12. John Jones and John Wall. priests and martyrs, I Order.
13. Bl. Angeline of Marsciano, religious. III Order (For the III Order
nuns: Memorial)
14. Francis Solano, priest, I Order
15. BONAVENTURE. BISHOP AND DOCTOR, I Order Feast
21. LAWRENCE OF BRINDISI, CAPUCHIN PRIEST AND DOCTOR, I Order Feast
23. Bl. Cunegunda. religious. II Order (For II and III Order nuns)
24. BI. Louise of Savoy, religious. II Order (For II and III Order nuns)
25. BI. Mary Magdalene of Martinengo, virgin, II Order (For II and III Order
nuns)
AUGUST
2. OUR LADY
OF THE ANGELS OF PORTIUNCULA Feast
7. Bls. Agathangelus and Cassian. Capuchin priests and martyrs. I Order
8. HOLY FATHER DOMINIC. PRIEST. FOUNDER OF THE ORDER OF REACHERS Feast
11. CLARE OF ASSISI. VIRGIN. II Order Feast (For II and III Order nuns:
Solemnity)
14. Bl. Maximilian Mary Kolbe. priest and martyr. I Order
19. Louis, bishop, I Order Memorial
25. Louis IX, King, Patron of the III Order
Memorial
SEPTEMBER
1. Bl.
Beatrice of Silva. virgin II Order
2. Bls. John Francis Burté: Severin Girault and
companions. martyrs. I and III Orders
4. Rose of Viterbo. virgin. III Order (For the III (Order)
17. STIGMATA OF OUR HOLY FATHER FRANCIS Feast
18. JOSEPH OF CUPERTINO. PRIEST. I Order Feast
20. Francis Mary of Camporosso, religious, I Order Memorial
23. Finding of the Body of St. Clare (For II and III Order nuns)
26. Elzear of Sabran and Bl. Delphina, husband and
wife, III Order (For the III Order)
OCTOBER
4. OUR HOLY
FATHER FRANCIS OF ASSISI, DEACON, FOUNDER OF THE THREE ORDERS Solemnity
6. Mary
Frances of the Five Wounds, virgin, III Order (For the III (Order)
10. Daniel,
priest, and companions, martyrs, I Order
12. St.
Seraphin of Montegranaro, religious, I Order
20. Bl. Contardo Ferrini, III Order (For the III (Order)
Bl. James of Strepar, bishop, I Order
21. Bl.
Josephine Leroux, virgin and martyr, II Order (For II and III Order nuns)
22. Peter
of Alcantara, priest, I Order Memorial
23. John of
Capistrano, priest, I Order Memorial
26. Bl.
Bonaventure of Potenza, priest, I Order
30.
ANNIVERSARY
OF DEDICATION IN CONSECRATED CHURCHES OF THE ORDER Solemnity
NOVEMBER
7. Didacus
of Alcala, religious, I Order
14.
Nicholas Tavelic, priest, and companions, martyrs, I Order Memorial
17.
ELIZABETH OF HUNGARY, Patroness of the III Order Feast
18. Bl.
Salome, virgin, II Order (For II and III Order nuns)
19. Agnes
of Assisi, virgin, II Order (For II and III Order nuns: Memorial)
24.
Commemoration of all the Deceased of the Seraphic Order Memorial
26. Leonard
of Port Maurice, priest, I Order Memorial
27. Bl.
Francis Anthony Fasani, priest, I Order
28. James
of the March, priest, I Order Memorial
29. ALL
SAINTS OF THE SERAPHIC PRDER Feast
DECEMBER
15. Bl.
Mary Frances Schervier, virgin, III Order (For the III (Order)
4. THE SAINTS
OF THE SECULAR FRANCISCAN ORDER
Saints
1.
Elizabeth of Hungary, W (d. 1231)?
2.
Ferdinand II of Castile, C (d. 1252)?
3. Rose of
Viterbo, V (d. 1252).
4. Louis IX
of France, C (d. 1270)?
5. Margaret
of Cortona, P (d. 1297).
6. Ivo of
Brittany, C (d. 1303)?
7. Elzear
of Sabran, C (d. 1323).
8. Rock of
Montpellier, C (d. 1327)?
9.
Elizabeth of Portugal, W (d. 1336)?
10. Conrad
of Piacenza, C (d. 1351).
11. Bridget
of Sweden, W (d. 1373).
12.
Catherine of Genoa, V (d. 1510)?
13. Thomas
More, M (d. 1535).
14. Charles
Borromeo, Bp (d. 1584)
15. Paul
Suzuki, M (d. 1597).
16. Gabriel
of Ize, M (d. 1597).
17. John
Kinuya, M ( d. 1597).
18. Thomas
Danki of Ize, M (d. 1597).
19. Francis
“the Doctor” of Mikayo, M (d. 1597).
20. Thomas
Kosaki, M (d. 1597).
21. Joachim
Sakakibara, M (d. 1597).
22.
Bonaventure of Mikayo, M (d. 1597).
23. Leo
Kasasumaru, M (d. 1597).
24.
Matthias of Mikayo, M (d. 1597).
25. Antony
of Nagasaki, M (d. 1597).
26. Louis
Iabaraki, M (d. 1597). .
27. Paul
Iabaraki, M ( d. 1597).
28. Michael
Kosaki, M (d. 1597).
29. Peter
Sukejiro, M (d. 1597).
30. Cosmas
Takeya, M (d. 1597).
31. Francis
Fahelante, M (d. 1597).
32. .Jane
Frances Fremyot de Chantal, W (d. 1641).
33. Mary
Anne of Jesus de Paredes, V (d. 1645).
34. Mary
Frances of the Five Wounds, V (d. 1791).
35. Joseph
Benedict Cottolengo, C (d. 1842).
36.
Vincentia Gerosa, V (d. 1847).
37. Vincent
Pallotti, C (d. 1850).
38. Emily
de Vialar, V (d. 1856).
39.
Jean-Marie Vianney, C (d. 1859).
40. Joseph
Cafasso, C (d. 1860)?
41. Mary
Joseph Rossello, V (d. 1880).
42. John
Bosco, C (d. 1888).
43. Pius X,
Pope (d. 1914).
44. Frances
Xavier Cabrini, V (d. 1917).
45 John
XXIII, Pope (d. 1963)
Blessed and
Beatae
1.
Viridiana de Attavantis, V (d. c. 1242)?
2.
Humiliana of Cerchi, W (d. 1246).
3. Luchesio
of Poggibonsi, C (d. 1260).
4. Gerard
of Villamagna, C (d. c. 1270).
5.
Novellone of Faenza, C (d. 1280).
6. James of
Citta della Pieve, M (d. 1286).
7. Peter
“the Comb-Maker" of Siena, C (d. 1289).
8.
Bartholomew of San Gimigniano, C (d. 1300).
9. John
Pelingotto of Urbino, C (d. 1304).
10. Amato
Ronconi of Saldezzo, C (d. 1304).
11. Joan of
Signa, V (d. 1307).
12. Angela
of Foligno, W (d. 1309).
13.
Chrisiana Menabuoi, V (d. 1310).
14. Ramon
Lull, M (d. 1316).
15. Ubald
of San Gimigniano, C (d. c. 1320).
16. Peter
Cresci of Foligno, C (d. 1323).
17. Francis
(“Cecco") Zanferdini of Pesaro, C (d. 1350).
18.
Michelina of Pesaro, W (d. 1356). .
19.
Delphina of Glandeves, V (d. 1360).
20. Charles
of Blois, C (d. 1364).
21.
Hugolino Magalotti, C (d. 1373).
22. Oddino
Barrotti, C (d. 1400).
23. William
of Scicli, C (d. 1404).
24.
Jeanne-Marie de Maille, W (d. 1414).
25. Peter
Gambacorti of Pisa, C (d. 1435).
26.
Nicholas of Forcapalena, C (d. 1449).
27. Paula
Gambara Costa, W (d. 1515).
28. Louisa
Albertoni, W (d. 1533).
29.
Hippolytus Galantini, C (d. 1619).
30. Leo
Satzuma, M (d. 1622).
31. Lucy
Freitas, W M (d. 1622).
32. Louis
Baba, M (d. 1624).
33. Caspar
Vaez, M (d. 1627).
34. Mary de
Vaez, M (d. 1627).
35. Thomas
o Jinemon, M (d. 1627).
36. Francis
Huhyoe, M (d. 1627).
37. Michael
Kizaemon, M (d. 1627).
38. Luke
Kiemon, M (d. 1627).
39. Louis
Matsuo Soemon, M (d. 1627).
40. Cayo
Jiemon, M (d. 1627).
41. Martin
Gomez, M (d. 1627).
42. Thomas
Tzugi, M (d. 1627).
43. Louis
Maki, M (d. 1627).
44. John
Maki, M (d. 1627).
45. Louis
Higashi, M (d. 1628).
46. Francis
Higashi, M (d. 1628).
47. Dominic
Higashi, M (d. 1628).
48. John
Tomachi, M (d. 1628).
49. Dominic
Tomachi, M (d. 1628).
50. Michael
Tomachi, M (d. 1628).
51. Paul
Tomachi, M (d. 1628).
52. Matthew
Alvarez, M (d. 1628).
53. Michael
Yamada, M (d. 1628).
54.
Laurence Yamada, M (d. 1628).
55. Raymund
of Omura, M (d. 1628).
56. Louisa
of Omura, V M (d. 1628).
57. Peter
of Senday, M (d. 1630).
58. Thomas
Sakujiro, M (d. 1630).
59. Peter
de Betancur, C (d. 1667).
60. John
Tchang, M (d. 1900).
61. Patrick
Tun, M (d. 1900).
62. John
Van, M (d. 1900).
65. Philip
Tchang, M (d. 1900).
64. John
Tchang of Nan-che, M (d. 1900).
65. Thomas
Sen, M (d. 1900).
66. Simon
Tcheng, M (d, 1900).
67. Peter
U-ngan-pan, M (d. 1900).
68. Francis
Tchang-iun, M (d. 1900).
69.
Matthias Fun-te, M (d. 1900).
70. Peter
Tchang-pan-nieu, M (d. 1900).
71.
Contardo Ferrini, C (d. 1902).
72. Louis
Guanella, C (d. 1915).
73. Erminio
Pampuni, C (d. 1930). .
1
In the feudal system, under which most common people lived in those days,
the population living in the territory of a landlord had to take an oath to
take up arms to defend the land in case of a war or an attack against it.
One of the most important aspects of being a follower of St. Francis was to
be a peaceful person, following the Gospel: “Offer no resistance to the
wicked. On the contrary, if anyone hits you on the right cheek, offer him
the other as well... Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute
you…” (Mt 5:39.44)
In those times the term “clerics” included other ministers besides priests
and deacons, such as sub-deacons, exorcists, church wardens, lectors,
acolytes and healers.
The clerics who could read were obliged to pray the Divine Office using a
breviary; those who were illiterate and lay people were to pray the Our
Father as follows: 12 for matins; 7 for morning prayer (called also Lauds);
7 at 9:00am (called Tierce); 7 at noon (called Sext); 7 at 3:00pm (called
None); 7 for Evening Prayer (called also Vespers) and 7 for Night Prayer
(called Compline). These times of prayer followed closely biblical and
Hebrew times of prayer, which were also adopted by the early Church and
monastic life.
One has to keep in mind that in the middle ages Holy Communion was received
only rarely and had become so much neglected that Pope Innocent III
introduced the Easter Duty during the IV Lateran Council in 1215: every
Catholic had to receive Holy Communion once a year to be considered a
Catholic and be given a Christian burial when he or she died.
In the time of St. Francis, persons living a public penitential life were
very common. While some lived in groups, others lived their own penance on
their own. Francis himself started his experience of conversion much like
many others in his time. While many fell into the sin of pride and
criticised the Church, Francis wanted to remain always faithful to it.
The interdict is a penalty inflicted by the Church for the commission
of certain ecclesiastical crimes, such as a physical attack on the bishop;
joining a secret society; publicly opposing the teaching of the Church
etc.. It applies either to groups of people (personal) or to a territory
(such as a country, a diocese or a parish). A personal interdict is a
punishment imposed on all the people of a territory, diocese or parish,
preventing them from attending liturgical services, receiving certain
sacraments and receiving Christian burial.
In 1517, Pope Leo X, separated the “Conventuals” from the “Observants” into
two distinct Orders under two General Ministers by grouping together all the
separate reforms under the name of Observants.
The Third Order Regular Friars observe the Third Order Rule instead that of
the First Order.
The First Order corresponds to the Friars Minor, who were founded by St.
Francis after he started having followers; the Second Order that of the Poor
Clares when he accepted St. Clare as his follower, but since she could not
follow Francis in exactly the same way as other friars, she became then the
co-foundress of the Order of Poor Clares, and the Third Order, which St.
Francis founded when lay and married people who could not leave other
commitments, like family life, wanted to follow him.
This means that they depend directly on their own Superiors, not from the
Superiors of the First Order.
CIOFS: International Council of the Secular Franciscan Order.
AFRICA: Chad,
Kenya, Mauritius, Madagascar, Republic of Central Africa, South Africa,
Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe. (9)
AMERICA: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada,
Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala,
Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Porto Rico, Dominican
Republic, Uruguay, Venezuela, USA. (22)
ASIA:
Korea, India, Japan, Lebanon, Oceania, Philippines, Vietnam. (7)
EUROPE:
Austria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Fiandre, France, Germany, Great
Britain, Holland, Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Portugal,
Slovacchia, Slovenia, Spain, Romania. (19)
The rooms of Franciscan friars are called cells, because they had to be
small and poor.
See ARMSTRONG, Regis A. (Ed.), Francis of Assisi: The Founder, New
City Press, 1999. Note on Page 548.
See 1 Cel 17 and 2 Cel 9.
The war between Assisi and Perugia in 1202, when St: Francis was taken
prisoner and the war between the Pope and the Emperor for land in the South
of Italy in 1205.
Credits: Br. Dennis Calleja:
The Capuchin Vocational Centre,
Maltese Capuchin Friars,
Province of St. Paul the Apostle
|